Litigation Techniques When Clients Deny Opioid Medication

After a personal injury or car accident, people often seek medical attention and the assistance of a lawyer. There is a symbiotic relationship between the medications and treatments clients receive and the monetary damages they are awarded in litigation. While the client’s decision to abstain from opioid use doesn’t make their injuries any less serious, it does create a hole where defense can argue that the injuries may be less severe.

Attorneys must understand their client’s reasoning when choosing not to take opioids, coach their client in the importance of keeping a record of pain, and work to understand the changing attitudes toward opioids in the general population.

In this article, learn how to control and respond to arguments defense may make when a client avoids taking prescription painkillers.

Widespread Impact of Opioid Epidemic is Changing Patient Care and Attitudes

Opioids can be dangerous for multiple reasons. Their primary purpose is to relieve the perception of pain through the central nervous system. Another effect that they have on many people can be a feeling of euphoria. This effect can be highly addictive for many. It is now widely known that these drugs can be extremely habit forming.

Some forms of opioids can include:

  • Oxycodone (1): Can be administered orally with a pill or liquid form. Oxycodone is prescribed to change how patients respond to pain. (Narcotic) This is considered a habit forming drug.
  • Hydrocodone: A pain reliever. It is an opioid medication that is often combined with a non-opioid pain reliever, acetaminophen, in prescription drugs such as Zolvit, Lorcet, Generic Xodol, Norco, Lortab, Norcol or Hycet.
  • Codeine: An opioid pain reliever. Often used to reduce coughing. In some medications it can be combined with acetaminophen or aspirin.
  • Other opioids include: OxyContin, Vicodin, morphine, fentanyl.

Sometimes opioids may be referred to as narcotics, and generally means a variety of medications or substances that dull senses or relieve pain. Today, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) defines narcotic as a drug containing opium, opium derivatives, and semi-synthetic opioid substitutes. The word “opioid” contains less ambiguity and is the word used by state and federal governments.

Risks of Opioid Therapy:

  • Some pain patients develop a serious, lifelong addiction to opioids. It is difficult to predict who will develop an addiction to prescription opioids. (2)
  • Opioids can cause constipation, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, withdrawal, drowsiness, and might make driving unsafe.
  • While every patient is different, most people using opioids long-term continue to say they have moderate to severe pain.
  • Patients using opioids long-term actually may report worse pain than those using other approaches to pain management.
  • Opioids, especially at high doses, can cause patients to stop breathing and die. Taking alcohol, sleeping pills or anxiety medications increases these risks.

Not all healthcare solutions are right for everyone. There are many reasons a person may choose not to manage pain with prescription opioids. Here lawyers can look at three reasons clients may deny taking opioids as a part of their treatment plan.

When a Plaintiff Chooses Not to Take Opioids

Some patients may choose not to take opioids for fear of addiction. As the opioid epidemic has touched the lives of so many, the patient may have been affected in their personal life by abuse of prescription drugs.

According to the CDC, more than 11.5 million Americans reported misusing prescription pain medicine in 2016. (3)

They may be aware of their own risk factors for an opioid addiction. Something in their medical history says that they are not a good candidate to take prescription opioids. Whatever the reason, a client’s wish not to take prescription painkillers is a choice between them and their doctor.

Severe Limitations Placed on Opioids

Patients could be suffering from an overzealous application of the CDC’s opioid prescribing guideline. After the CDC laid out new regulations limiting the use of opioids in treating pain, physicians and pharmacists cut back on prescriptions. (3)

However, in some cases providers and insurance providers enforced the regulations overzealously. In an extreme case detailed in a meeting of the American Medical Association, a client attempted to commit suicide after a pharmacist denied filling a patient’s prescription.

Overzealous restrictions can occur at multiple levels of the healthcare system.

With doctors and providers:
In 2017(5), the Texas State Legislature gave the Texas Medical Board greater power over physicians in regulating opioid prescriptions. In order to protect public health and welfare, the legislature concluded that the Medical Board needed the power to conduct investigations of opioid prescriptions. Now the medical board can conduct investigations and discipline doctors if they find improper care. This does good for doctors who are indeed overprescribing the medication. It is possible, however, that restrictions could cause doctors to believe that their prescriptions should never go outside the CDC’s recommended use out of fear of discipline.

Limitations imposed by companies:
In order to limit their role in the opioid epidemic, pharmacy chains like Walmart and CVS have mandatory restrictions on opioid prescriptions they will fill. In addition, large pharmacy chains have their own internal set of rules often based on the CDC’s dosage recommendations. Policies like this go beyond the CDC dosage guidance which is only intended to apply to patients with no medical history of taking opioids. Some personal injury clients could have their refills unnecessarily denied or delayed due to these policies.

Fearing penalties related to overprescription of opioids, doctors have cut back. In some cases it may be too far. Talk with your client if there have been any lapses in their medical treatment that could come up in trial.

Risks of Opioids in Everyday Life

In some cases, clients may not be able to take opioids for pain relief due to work restrictions. Some jobs cannot be performed while on certain medications. An opioid prescription may impact their ability to perform essential job duties. On top of that, side effects of opioids such as drowsiness, poor coordination, or slowed reaction times could put the plaintiff or coworkers at risk.
For some plaintiffs, work is an essential part of their identity. They may feel that taking time off of work could fundamentally change them as a person. In this situation, an attorney representing their client could choose to own their decision. Perhaps the client works with children, and the cost of being unable to fill their role as caretaker could diminish their chances to a successful recovery. An attorney who is able to explain and illustrate their reasoning may be able to demonstrate to a jury the importance their work places in their ability to cope with changes to daily life and recover mentally from injuries in a workplace role cherished by them.

Framing the Narrative with Reasoning, Evidence of Injury, and Alternative Treatments

Communicate with your client openly about how defense attorneys will use the choice not to take medication to diminish the credibility of injuries. Prepare the client to speak about their decision not to take opioids during deposition, or at trial.

Communicating a Client’s Decision Making Process

The client who chooses not to take opioids should know that juries will have reason to believe that they could be money-seeking after the crash. While that isn’t the case, the plaintiff must be able to explain their decision making process in choosing to abstain from the drugs.

Evidence of Injury

Even if a client is unable to or chooses not to take opioids, they will still experience pain. The client’s decision not to take opioids may be used as evidence by defense to cast doubt on their injuries. The client should do everything they can to clearly articulate to medical professionals and in an injury journal the pain they are experiencing as a result of the crash.

Among some patients, pain is met with stoicism. Rather than acknowledge injuries, some prefer to stay strong in times of hardship. While this is admirable, it does not provide their case with evidence indicating the severity of their injuries. Patients should not minimize their injuries in resignation.

Clients must communicate clearly with their health providers about the severity of their pain. Where there is lack of medical evidence for treatment of pain, clients must know they need to establish a record of pain and discomfort to communicate their medical condition during deposition or trial.

Alternative treatments:

When opioids are not an option for clients, there are alternative ways to manage pain. Some hospitals employ psychologists who are trained in helping patients manage pain after a serious accident. Other possible pain management strategies can include acupuncture, chiropractic, meditation, yoga and CBD.

Communication with Client About Litigation Strategy

As treatment options for severe injuries change, attorneys must be aware that attitudes towards opioids and alternative pain management will evolve over time. In all things, the most important task is to maintain open and honest communication with the client.

Lawyers representing clients with the choice not to take opioids may take some of these key strategies for defense with them into litigation. In order to reach a just outcome for the client, attorneys must respond to a changing perception of opioid use.

Recent Personal Injury Case Results

The McMinn Law Firm has helped injured Austinites for fifteen years, winning over 100 million dollars in settlements to date.

Uninsured Motorist Accident

$350,000

Drunk Driver Accident

$1,300,000

Truck Accident Victim

$1,200,000

Austin Personal Injury Lawyers Waiting To Help You

We specialise representing clients in the following areas, we are waiting to help you on your personal injury case.

Personal Injury Lawyer

Learn More

Austin Car Accident

Learn More

Motorcycle Accident

Learn More

Ride Share Accident

Learn More

Truck Accident Lawyer

Learn More

18 Wheeler Accident

Learn More

Employment Accident

Learn More

Catastrophic Injuries

Learn More

Our Awards

Better Business Bureau (BBB) bases its ratings on information provided by the business, and on public data sources. McMinn Law Firm's A+ rating is the highest available.
In the years 2013-2014 and 2016-2019, Justin McMinn has been selected each year as a Rising Star by Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters service. Jason McMinn has been selected as a Super Lawyer in 2020.
Expertise.com, a company that evaluates and recommends local service professionals, placed McMinn Law Firm on their list of 20 recommended car accident attorneys in Austin.

What Past Clients Are Saying

"Jason, Justin, and their entire support team represented me in an accident involving an 18 wheeler. I couldn’t have asked for a better outcome, and maybe as importantly, the service along the way was something you would want as a client, their entire team was amazing! I can with great confidence recommend them to friends, family, and to anyone who happens to read this. Thank you McMinn Law Firm for a job well done!"

- Charles

"The McMinns were amazing. Within two days of my accident – and still barely able to move – I received a visit to my house for personal consultation (on a Saturday). All the initial feedback about my potential case turned out to be 100% accurate, and when it finally came time to settle they didn’t back off an inch. …If you’re hurt, make the call."

- Harry

"I was rear ended by a large truck. Am thankful for Justin and Jason and their team and all the hard work they put into resolving my case! I highly recommend that you contact them if you’re injured in a wreck!"

- Lori M.

In Need Of Compensation?

Let us – at no cost to you – evaluate your situation so you can be sure. We don’t get paid unless you do. Call or reach out today to speak to an attorney with no obligations.